We explore how low-speed collisions can have substantial energy transfers with minimal (if any) damage. Here we will discuss the myth of “no damage = no injury” from a vehicle appearance/design point of view and how it relates to injury in a collision.
To get into this subject, we need a little history lesson first. With vehicle style being the topic of focus, the industry exploded after World War II. The jet age influenced bumpers, headlights and taillight’s fins. Something else happened too, for the first time in the automobile’s history, vehicles were more than “around town” horse-less buggies; the power of their engines and speeds potential dawned a whole new arena — security. In the 1960’s vehicle aesthetics began to compromise with safety. Automotive designers started to consider topics like; occupant restraints structural integrity, and crashworthiness.
The industry faced slow growth and changed into the 1980’s, each revision or change did bring with its progress and progress but not enough at any one time to be a huge leap forward. The changes which were necessary were too experimental, too cost prohibitive, or just also market risky. Then in the 1980’s a revolution in business started to take hold — the computer. The personal computer allowed for design changes with efficiency. Once plugged in and switched on the days spend calculating dual function and variables became complicated than a few clicks.
The computer made it possible for car manufacturers to reduce years of conventional design and research practices into only a month or two and at the same time, it allowed for much more cost-effective experimentation and new process development.
Now that We’ve completed history 101 let Us discuss the topic of Stage – “no damage = no injury.”
Vehicle layout, as an approach or concept, has undergone a considerable overhaul in recent years. The change has influenced the use of bumper covers. The long-standing tradition in design is to make them of an alloy and to put the outside or separate from the body. (Consider all those classics in “American Graffiti”). The bumper was designed to function as a compliment to the vehicle’s appearance. The safety perspective was non-existent with respect as they were no longer than a sacrificial lamb to save the body.
In the early 1970’s federal mandates designed to make vehicles safer forced the producers to engineer larger and much more structurally sound designs. The most noted changes where the moving of the bumper away from the body itself to an essential part of the car. This “afterthought” look borrowed from the truck world was the standard until the late 1980’s. Three things changed in the 1980’s: First, bumpers began to move to behind urethane bumper covers in usage.
Vehicles and assisted with aerodynamics. Because aesthetics were no more part of the equation, bumpers became stronger and included the use of energy absorbing material between the bumper structure and the bumper cover. Finally, automotive paints had also advanced, including the ability to resist cracking & flaking, and had become elastic.
These changes also had another positive side effect; because of the elastic properties of urethane and the paint, minor collisions, even those who damaged the bumper behind them, no longer seemed as dangerous. Often a bumper cover needed more than some paint and prep, where past designs necessitated changing the bumper.
The most significant change between the older design and the new one is the inherent elasticity of the new bumper covers. These covers can, and do, rebound into the model they have been formed in and the use of paint that is elastic means the color is likely to bounce as well. The assessment of speed from damage is currently poorer while signs of impact are evident. When a steel bumper gets distorted, it remains that way leaving no room for underestimation.
Notice how we have not discussed these design changes have gained energy transfer, and this isn’t any mistake. There are no groundbreaking points. Changes in vehicle design are not going to ease violation of laws of physics. All these design changes make the energy transfer in a low-speed crash less costly and less apparent.
However, there are Just demonstrable measures that can be taken to assess the effects of energy transfer in no apparent damage collisions:
The scope of our information is limited to chiropractic and spinal injuries and conditions. To discuss options on the subject matter, please feel free to ask Dr. Jimenez or contact us at 915-850-0900.
Whiplash is a commonly reported injury after an automobile accident. During an auto accident, the sheer force of the impact often causes the head and neck of the victim to jerk abruptly, back-and-forth, causing damage to the complex structures surrounding the cervical spine. Chiropractic care is a safe and effective, alternative treatment option utilized to help decrease the symptoms of whiplash.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiMcbg7W92o Dr. Alex Jimenez brings you part two of the Functional Medicine episodes where Medical… Read More
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nj3H5n77z-I In this Functional Medicine podcast, Dr. Alex Jimenez, Master Nutritionist Ana Paola Rodriguez Arciniega,… Read More
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEJes9pLbk8 In this edition of the Functional Medicine Podcasts Dr, Jimenez, Kenna Lee Vaughn Chief… Read More
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_WNpts5WnU Today Dr. Jimenez, Kenna Lee Vaughn and Master Nutritionist Present Insights into Fibromyalgia Migrains… Read More
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cT9eXwd1ZNI Read More
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZelMl-1f_M Today Dr. Marius Ruja & Dr. Alex Jimenez will discuss Metabolic Syndrome and Associated… Read More